Image source: Getty Images. See all posts by Royston Wild Buy-to-let investor numbers at 7-YEAR lows! I’d rather buy these FTSE 100 dividend stars Are buy-to-let investors finally catching a break? Tales of rising tax bills, swelling operating costs, and heaps of increased regulation have dominated the financial pages in recent years. But the start of a new calendar year has revealed some encouraging news for investors when it comes to rent. Particularly for those who happen to own property north of the border.If rents are ballooning, however, why are buy-to-let investors leaving in their droves?5G is here – and shares of this ‘sleeping giant’ could be a great way for you to potentially profit!According to one leading industry firm, the 5G boom could create a global industry worth US$12.3 TRILLION out of thin air…And if you click here we’ll show you something that could be key to unlocking 5G’s full potential…The exodus continues!Data released today from Hamptons International underlines the scale of the landlord exodus in Britain. The number of buy-to-let operators fell 8% (or 222,570) in 2019 to 2.66m, the estate agency says, from the record peak of 2.88m in 2017. Last year’s figure is also the lowest for seven years when there were 2.58m investors knocking around.Hamptons notes that “tax and regulatory changes have caused some landlords to sell up and leave the sector.” This caused the number of available homes for rent to drop to 5.13m last year too. This is also a reduction of 156,410 from those peaks of two years earlier.Source: EHS, Gov.Scot, Stats Wales & Hamptons InternationalThat Hamptons report revealed something curious though. While the number of landlords is in decline, the size of the property portfolio of those still involved is rising. The average UK landlord now owns 1.93 properties, according to the agency. This is the highest level since 2009 and is “a further sign that the sector is professionalising,” Hamptons says.Better buysThis latest study underlines the growing financial strain the average buy-to-let investor faces today. Reports show that returns from the property rental sector have taken a hammering of late. And a growing number have little confidence that investing conditions are going to improve any time soon.I certainly haven’t bothered with buy-to-let. Wanting a slice of the UK property sector, I instead decided to park my cash in FTSE 100 housebuilders Barratt Developments and Taylor Wimpey. Investing in those other Footsie shares Persimmon and The Berkeley Group is also a good option for long-term investors.Getting rich the Foolish wayFirstly, buying Taylor Wimpey and Barratt didn’t require the sort of heaving up-front costs buy-to-let buying involves. I didn’t need to stump up a deposit, large solicitor fees, stamp duty, or a raft of other miscellaneous costs. I also knew I wouldn’t have to worry about how I’d pay back a mortgage if tenants failed to pay the rent, or during times when the property laid vacant.The exceptional value these blue-chips offered was also hugely attractive. Forward P/E ratios that sat way, way below the FTSE 100 average of around 15 times. And truly-staggering dividend yields that mashed those of most other shares on the index.Little has changed on either front since I took the plunge. Those four firms I mentioned offer payout yields ranging 5% and 8%. What’s more, each trade on very-attractive earnings multiples of between 11 times and 15 times too.And with government getting tougher and tougher with landlords, I’d say that these stocks are more appealing than buy-to-let than ever before “This Stock Could Be Like Buying Amazon in 1997” I’m sure you’ll agree that’s quite the statement from Motley Fool Co-Founder Tom Gardner.But since our US analyst team first recommended shares in this unique tech stock back in 2016, the value has soared.What’s more, we firmly believe there’s still plenty of upside in its future. In fact, even throughout the current coronavirus crisis, its performance has been beating Wall St expectations.And right now, we’re giving you a chance to discover exactly what has got our analysts all fired up about this niche industry phenomenon, in our FREE special report, A Top US Share From The Motley Fool. Simply click below to discover how you can take advantage of this. Click here to claim your copy now — and we’ll tell you the name of this Top US Share… free of charge! Our 6 ‘Best Buys Now’ Shares I would like to receive emails from you about product information and offers from The Fool and its business partners. Each of these emails will provide a link to unsubscribe from future emails. More information about how The Fool collects, stores, and handles personal data is available in its Privacy Statement. Renowned stock-picker Mark Rogers and his analyst team at The Motley Fool UK have named 6 shares that they believe UK investors should consider buying NOW.So if you’re looking for more stock ideas to try and best position your portfolio today, then it might be a good day for you. Because we’re offering a full 33% off your first year of membership to our flagship share-tipping service, backed by our ‘no quibbles’ 30-day subscription fee refund guarantee. Royston Wild owns shares of Barratt Developments and Taylor Wimpey. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Enter Your Email Address Royston Wild | Monday, 17th February, 2020
in order to let more people know about the event, we need your power, if you have a website, blog please link into the topic page, our address is: http://s.index.club.china.com/zh_cn/focus/cnn/index.html let the voice of justice through the Internet
chain into our special page please write replies to your web site, we will add your website in response to website names
Full text of the
March 2008, is destined to go down in history is more important in Internet history day: for the bloody events of Tibet minority "molecular manufacturing China Tibet independence" in the streets of Lhasa, as the western mainstream media CNN (CNN), even in spite of news facts, at least in violation of the news occupation morals, a "Tibet independence" molecular one-sided published photos of military attacks. The picture shows the vehicles running in the streets of Lhasa, next to a car in front of burning, someone was running. According to the Chinese users find and upload the original photo we see the picture right there are some of the terrorists involved in vandalism burning to the military threw stones, flying stone, roadside burning motorcycle and more crazy stone throwing vandalism molecular screen is clearly visible. But the CNN editor is blind, who can better reflect the "Tibetan terrorists" ugly screen cut to just keep the main picture, reflect the intention is in, but describe the content but be quite different. The CNN report was discovered, immediately attracted the majority of Internet users China patriotic indignation, we have up the attack, and even friends shout the classic slogan: don’t be too CNN
man can not be too CNN, meaning there are a variety of explanations: 1.cao Ni Niang; 2.cao Ni nai; 3…… Although the meaning and tone is not too good, but the majority of users have expressed outrage! The netizen says, CNN is cut to cut pictures, is a reflection of the mob attacking military vehicles in the CNN picture, this is where they interpret out of context, confuse the public, in order to achieve their purpose? Not to be divulged to Chinese people will not agree! CNN completely unmasked hypocrisy, ugliness in the distorted reports in Western media often attack! Chinese democracy, human rights, its real purpose is to attack the government China, curb Chinese rise, the campaign for the western division in china. This incident once again shows that the western media coverage of Chinese affairs, more with tainted glasses to see the events Chinese, they disregard the facts, one-sided and arbitrary view of Chinese government behavior, which may be related to, and their government background and, through the real case, we can be more the further understanding to the West is the freedom of the press, serve the national political purpose, their so-called "pure freedom of the press" is not willing! "