LaLiga Santander* Data updated as of March 19, 2020 Joel Robles is a untouchable piece in this Betis and it served to multiply their numbers respect to its leading role in previous seasons. After making the leap to the elite ten years ago in Atlético de Madrid, now reaches its best number of games played (27) in a campaign by becoming Rubi’s best asset for Betis’ goal, close to turning 30. He went through clubs like Atlé himselfTico, Rayo Vallecano, Wigan or Everton, but the one from Getafe never found the stability and prominence that it does currently have in the Verdiblanco project despite the fact that he did sign 25 duels with Everton in 2015-2016 in various competitions. his future It seems full of stability now and hope to keep counting with the verdiblanco coach confidence in this end of campaign still to be determined. Your competition, Dani Martín, He does not enjoy the same luck and the unknowns about his performance after several appointments of doubts such as that of Vallecas in the Copa del Rey shoot the options of a goal with variations the next season. At 29 years old, Joel no longer wants supporting roles. And Betis seems their best ally. his appearance at Betis last year (5 league games) he was conditioned to the presence of Pau López, who took some advantage over him to command the goal directed by Quique Setién before leaving for Rome in the summer. “Is he best partner I’ve had in my entire career “ He said international goalkeeper about him in an interview with this newspaper while that competition found positive fruits in Heliopolis. Now, without Pau’s shadow, sign a unexpected role which also led him to be one of the goalkeepers who made the most stops at the start of the course.
Guyana, on March 29, 2018, filed an application with the International Court of Justice (ICJ) against Venezuela – requesting, among many things, that Venezuela refrain from threatening or using force against any person and/or company licensed by Guyana or engage in economic or commercial activity in Guyanese territory.“Venezuela shall refrain from threatening or using force against any person and/or company licensed by Guyana or engage in economic or commercial activity in Guyanese territory as determined by the1899 Award and 1905 Agreement, or in any maritime areas appurtenant to such territory over which Guyana has sovereignty or exercises sovereign rights, and shall not interfere with any Guyanese or Guyanese authorised activities in thoseThe International Court of Justiceareas,” a release by the principal judicial organ of the United Nations said.Moreover, in its application, Guyana requested the court “to confirm the legal validity and binding effect of the Award Regarding the Boundary between the Colony of British Guiana and theUnited States of Venezuela.”“The applicant claims that the 1899 Award was “a full, perfect, and final settlement” of all questions relating to determining the boundary line between the colony of British Guiana and Venezuela.Guyana affirms that, between November 1900 and June 1904, a joint Anglo-Venezuelan Boundary Commission “identified, demarcated and permanently fixed the boundary established by the Award” before the signing of a Joint Declaration by the Commissioners on 10 January 1905 (referred to by Guyana as the “1905 Agreement”).”Guyana contends that in 1962, for the first time, Venezuela contested the Award as “arbitrary” and “null and void” and according to them, this led to the signing of the Agreement to resolve the controversy between Venezuela and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland over the frontier between Venezuela and British Guiana at Geneva on 17 February 1966, which “provided for recourse to a series of dispute settlement mechanisms to finally resolve the controversy”.The applicant [Guyana] further submits that the Geneva Agreement authorised the United NationsSecretary General to decide which appropriate dispute resolution mechanism to adopt for the peaceful settlement of the controversy, in accordance with Article 33 of the United Nations Charter.As such, the applicant requests that the Court adjudge and declare that “the 1899 Award is valid and binding upon Guyana and Venezuela, and the boundary established by that Award and the 1905Agreement is valid and binding upon Guyana and Venezuela”; “Guyana enjoys full sovereignty over the territory between the Essequibo River and the boundary established by the 1899 Award and the 1905 Agreement, and Venezuela enjoys full sovereignty over the territory west of that boundary; Guyana and Venezuela are under an obligation to fully respect each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity in accordance with the boundary established by the 1899 Award and the 1905 Agreement”; “Venezuela shall immediately withdraw from and cease its occupation of the eastern half of the Island of Ankoko, and each and every other territory which is recognised as Guyana’s sovereign territory in accordance with the 1899 Award and 1905 Agreement,” and “Venezuela is internationally responsible for violations of Guyana’s sovereignty and sovereign rights, and for all injuries suffered by Guyana as a consequence.”